"That we henceforth be no more children, wavering and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the deceit of men, and with craftiness, whereby they lay in wait to deceive."
Ephesians 4:14
Many a scholar and profound expert of trade and world peace conjecture that these times in which we live offer the most burdensome problem governance: a constitution so fragile that merely applying its tenets will destroy the very foundations upon which our Nation stands. "How can you support President Trump when he tried to overturn electoral college votes? That’s illegal and tyrannical." Amazing how the trumpeting of the false narrative rings so loudly in the air from cable news outlets, social media caverns, and The Communist Manifesto-thumping pseudo-intellectuals of our day. How weak a document! How weak an institution! Should a politician stand as a statesman upon the floors of the US House and Senate today, in the most enormous hour of our Nation since the Rutherford B. Hayes vs Samuel J. Tilden presidential election of 1876, and dare question not merely the validity but the sanctity of the certification of the electoral college then, our Nation shall perish even as the words are spoken.
Indeed, nursery rhymes of our youth are far better references to the tragedy of constitutional reporting by armchair social media tyrants of this day than even the writings of Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton. Threatened by the preponderance of evidence and statesmen charged with the responsibility of representing the over 74 Million American voters that elected President Donald Trump to a second term, what is the best defense of the Radical Left and its Mainstream Media minions? The President did not have a "perfect" phone. Not the Fake Russia, Russia, Russia Impeachment narrative! No, this time it is the phone call between the President and the Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger. The Lid's Jeff Dunetz writes, " 'The WAPO claimed that in his talk with Raffensperger, Trump “repeatedly urged him to alter the outcome of the presidential vote in the state.' The WAPO lied. When you read the full transcript below what becomes obvious is that Trump was not asking Raffensberger to cheat or commit voter fraud. The President made his case that there was voter fraud in Georgia." Nothing makes Lincoln Project patrons like Talitha McEachin jump on the Zuckerberg freeway and spread half-truths and full lies like the Jeff Bezos WAPO. Maybe there is enough time for "Barely Voted In" House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and "Hoping the Dominion Machines are linked to the Internet" Senate Minority Leader Chuckie Schummer to impeach the President? We will call it the "Georgia, Georgia, Georgia On Our Minds Project". The folly of fools often delivers the day in times when men are weak and passive and seek the guidance of blind men to order their steps. Yet, the men of this day are neither fooled by the fanciers of George Soros funded propaganda any longer for they know that such profound readers of news and information to the American public are following the pipings of manipulative flutists.
To contest an election, it seems only the sport of Kings and Democrat-Marxists. T'would a socialist or communist in Congress doubt the legitimacy of an election then, CNN and its Joseph Goebbels Award Winning public announcers would render cradle to grave coverage of the American heroes that are sacrificing everything to save Democracy. U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) collected a few testaments to such squalor:
In 2005, Senator Barbara Boxer and Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones Objected to the Electoral College Votes from Ohio.
Stephanie Tubs-Jones Said, “I Raise This Objection Because I Am Convinced That We As A Body Must Conduct A Formal And Legitimate Debate About Election Irregularities." (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 3:10-3:20)
Boxer views her 2005 objection as “her proudest moment on the Senate floor,” according to CNN. (CNN, 12/27/2020)
In January 2005, 31 Congressional Democrats Voted To Reject Ohio’s Electoral Votes. (CNN, 1/6/05)
Nancy Pelosi Praised The 2005 Objections, Saying Democrats Were “Speaking Up For Their Aggrieved Constituents” During “Their Only Opportunity To Have This Debate While The Country Is Listening"
Nancy Pelosi Said “We Are Witnessing Democracy At Work” And “This Debate Is Fundamental To Our Democracy." "[T]oday we are witnessing democracy at work. This is not, as some of our Republican colleagues have referred to it, sadly, frivolous. This debate is fundamental to our democracy." (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 32:49-33:08)
Pelosi Said Democrats Were “Speaking Up For Their Aggrieved Constituents, Many Of Whom May Have Been Disenfranchised In This Process." "The Members of Congress who have brought this challenge are speaking up for their aggrieved constituents, many of whom may have been disenfranchised in this process. This is their only opportunity to have this debate while the country is listening, and it is appropriate to do so. If there were other venues of this caliber, we would have taken that opportunity. But this is the opportunity. We have a responsibility to take advantage of it." (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 34:14-34:45)
Pelosi Said “This Is Their Only Opportunity To Have This Debate While The Country Is Listening” And “We Have A Responsibility To Take Advantage Of It." (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 34:14-34:45)
Pelosi Said “Do Not Talk About This As A ‘Conspiracy Theory.'" "[P]lease do not talk about this as a ‘conspiracy theory.’ It is not about that. It is not about conspiracy; it is about the Constitution of the United States." (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 39:50-40:03)
In 2017, At Least Seven House Democrats Sought To Object To Electoral Votes In Favor Of President Trump:
Jim McGovern Said “The Electors Were Not Lawfully Certified, Especially Given The Confirmed And Illegal Activities Engaged By The Government Of Russia." (CNN, 1/6/17)
Raul Grijalva Objected After North Carolina’s Tally. (CNN, 1/6/17)
Pramila Jayapal Objected To Georgia’s Vote Certificate. (CNN, 1/6/17)
Jamie Raskin Objected To 10 Of Florida’s 29 Electoral Votes, Saying “They Violated Florida’s Prohibition Against Dual Office Holders." (CNN, 1/6/17)
Maxine Waters Objected. (CNN, 1/6/17)
Lord, Congressman/Congresswoman Maxine Waters objected to the election and was revered as a Voting Rights Hero. Senator Hawley will object and the entire US Constitution will fall to pieces. Hey, Congressman/Congresswoman Jim McGovern, beam me up on that Russia, Russia, Russia starship!
You see, when it was just a few House guys and a single US Senator questioning America's first perfect presidential election then, the Left scoffed as if they were at a comedy club roast of Kathy Griffin by former Democratic New York Congressman, Anthony Weiner. However, on Friday afternoon, foam began to seethe from their scowling mouths when the name Ted Cruz was uttered. Man, o, woman, this was not about a Sen. Barbara Boxer moment on the screen originally built by Jane Fonda's ex-husband, Ted Turner. In District of Columbia v. Heller, Cruz drafted the amicus brief signed by the attorneys general of 31 states arguing that the Washington, D.C. handgun ban should be struck down as infringing upon the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. Winner, Winner, Chicken Dinner! Score One for the Conservative against the Marxists. In 2010, Texas Lawyer named him one of the 25 Greatest Texas Lawyers of the Past Quarter Century. Democrat-Marxist, former U.S. Representative Beto O'Rourke, lost his Texas US Senate bid to Cruz. The lap puppy for Planned Parenthood and Gun Control had his cowgirl hat handed to him in his election loss. Score another for the Conservatives against the Marxists. Yeah, all of a sudden contesting the election just got real.
Against the staunch "Surrender Caucus" warnings of Majority Leader Senator Addison Mitchell McConnell Jr. and his wannabe conservative sidekick, John Randolph Thune, Hawley, Cruz, and ten other senators have told them to kiss their Governor Kristi Noem arses and dared the Speaker Pelosi-Minority Leader Chuckie Schumer GOP to veto them. At last mention, Sens. Ron Johnson (R-WI), James Lankford (R-OK), Steve Daines (R-MT), John Kennedy (R-LA), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), and Mike Braun (R-IN), and Sens.-Elect Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), Roger Marshall (R-KS), Bill Hagerty (R-TN), and Tommy Tuberville (R-AL). At least 140 Republican House members reportedly plan to vote against certification of the Electoral College vote on January 6. Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL), who should be the next Speaker of the House in "Take Back America 2022", and several other conservative members of the House met with Trump and Vice President Mike Pence to discuss the claims of fraud and said they were confident members of both the House and Senate would vote to debate the legitimacy of the votes.
irony noun
iro·ny | \ ˈī-rə-nē also ˈī(-ə)r-nē \
plural ironies
Definition of irony
1a: the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning
b: a usually humorous or sardonic literary style or form characterized by irony
c: an ironic expression or utterance
2a(1): incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal or expected result
(2): an event or result marked by such incongruity
b: incongruity between a situation developed in a drama and the accompanying words or actions that is understood by the audience but not by the characters in the play
— called also dramatic irony
3: a pretense of ignorance and of willingness to learn from another assumed in order to make the other's false conceptions conspicuous by adroit questioning
— called also Socratic irony
We seek not to overturn elections. We seek the implementation of justice as afforded by the United States Constitution. Senator Cruz says it best:
"Look, we got to vote on January 6th on certification and every member of Congress faces a dilemma. Frankly, two pretty lousy choices: one, we can vote to certify by not considering any objection. If we do that, that will be heard by a lot of Americans as saying, 'We don't think voter fraud is a real concern. We don't think these claims should be investigated thoroughly,'" Cruz explained. "I know that's not what most of us believe. And, secondly, almost all of us don't want to be in a position where we're suggesting setting aside the results of an election just because the candidate we supported didn't happen to prevail. That's not a principled constitutional position."
"I’m a conservative. I voted Republican, and we lost. The notion that if you lose it must be rigged is a position that should have been corrected on the playground years ago. I hope our children are not paying attention. This is really an embarrassment."
Craig Eichelman / Facebook / Missouri Conservative Forum
I suppose Craig and others like him never heard of the 1961 St Joseph's Hawks. Head coach Jack Ramsey's team finished third place in the NCAA Tournament, but all four of their tournament games were wiped off the books after an NCAA investigation involving impermissible benefits from gambling. Wait a minute, someone actually testified that an egregious error was made for the whole world to see. That this act was done in secret in an attempt to keep the world from knowing. As well, in finding out, the appropriate institutions were challenged to do something about it and they did. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) actually penalized the University. Apparently, it was illegal to take bribes and fix games on the playground. On the street, they call it "hustling". I hope our children are not paying attention. This is really an embarrassment.
Since you believe that what is done is done no matter in what manner it is done then, let us send a special message to some people that can do something about it.
Senate Majority Leader McConnell, because President Donald Trump secured the First Perfect Presidential Election--one without either Voter Suppression (Greatest Concern of Democrat-Marxists) or Voter Fraud (Certainly Unproved in At Least 7 State Elections: Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico) then, we no longer need the following Federal Election laws passed over the years to help protect Americans’ right to vote and make it easier for citizens to exercise that right:
The Civil Rights Acts created some of the earliest federal protections against discrimination in voting. These protections were first outlined by the Civil Rights Act of 1870 and were later amended by the Civil Rights Acts of
1957
1960
1964
The Voting Rights Act of 1965 prohibited voter discrimination based on race, color, or membership in a language minority group. It also required certain places to provide election materials in languages besides English.
The Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act of 1984 required polling places to be accessible to people with disabilities.
The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) of 1986 allowed members of the U.S. armed forces and overseas U.S. voters to register and vote by mail.
The National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) of 1993 created new ways to register to vote. It also called for states to keep more accurate voter registration lists.
The Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002 authorized federal funds for elections. It also created the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC). The EAC helps states comply with HAVA to adopt minimum standards on voter education, registration, and ballots.
The Military and Overseas Voting Empowerment (MOVE) Act of 2009 improved access to voting by military and overseas voters.
We as a Nation have achieved perfection. We no longer need to litigate for fraud, cheating, theft, and destruction in the course of an election. Repeal America's Federal Election Laws! Please Make This A Legislative Agenda for 2021. Thanks!
Greatest of All-Time (GOAT): President Donald "Never Started A War" Trump.
CORPORATE ADDRESS
Kenneth McClenton
Founder, Chairman, and President
TECN® TV
1307 44th Place SE
Washington, DC 20019
Phone 202-660-1329 Ext 0
THE EXCEPTIONAL CONSERVATIVE NETWORK®
www.tecntv.com
www.theexceptionalconservativeshow.com
ken@theexceptionalconservativeshow.com
No comments:
Post a Comment