The Voice of Liberty: Marxism Is Slavery. Say It Loud! Say It Often.

“The great difference between our western Christian world and the atheistic Communist world is not political, gentlemen, it is moral.”

― Wisconsin Senator Joseph McCarthy, "Enemies Within" Speech, February 1950

Ideas are eternal and sympathies to mortals that pervert them are as well. How often have we sent our most brilliant and moral youth off to the slaughterhouses of educational butcheries to see then become indoctrinated professors of class struggle, no matter the degree. Once vibrant critical thinkers, our lambs are extorted for a few University grades and the promises of eternal attractiveness in the world's workplaces. Yoked with enormous satchels of student loan debt they become slaves to the vanity of those that installed such misery upon them. Sheep fastened over the neck with the past, can no longer satisfy themselves in the present for the days ahead are so bleak. No longer the curious inquirers of the future, emboldened by individuality and meritocracy, the sheeple deny the principles of America for the propaganda of the world. In order to trod successfully, the sheep are convinced that they are goats and that all that is perfect is found in the struggle. Eternal victims of deceit, the talented few must forge a utopic pathway, laden with bloodshed, to lead the miseducated into a time that is content with a land that has eradicated all of the threats of inequality, injustice, and environmental imperfection. The stains of the world must be cleansed through the violent discontent of those that are better than all others. The elite shall lead and those that follow shall be happy and without. For this, our souls are surrendered and all that is free shall gladly be enslaved. Smile. Misery has born its company and all that is is the struggle. America is no more.

Marxism Is Slavery. Say It Loud! Say It Often.

Marxism Is Slavery. Since Joseph convinced the world to serve Pharaoh as slaves, mankind has sought every avenue of thought to install rulership over creation rather than governorship. Marxism is no different. We like to frame it in the sophistication of "human rights" rather than the primeval refrain of "natural rights". Yet, slavery is nothing more than allowing another to seize what God has granted you for the sake of their well-being. The struggle results. The fight exists to regain the freedoms lost and the liberties stolen either by the profane of the individual or the corruption of the state. Either by public--state-- or private--individual--means, the authority is no longer God but man. C. S. Lewis, Mere Christianity, wrote: "And out of that hopeless attempt has come nearly all that we call human history—money, poverty, ambition, war, prostitution, classes, empires, slavery—the long terrible story of man trying to find something other than God which will make him happy.” Karl Marx would contend his socio-economic labor yields the following summation: "Marxism acknowledges that there exists a historical tendency to divide people into social classes that are characterized by inequality and injustice; This results in a constant state of class struggle." I like the Lewis' rephrase of the Man vs God complex. Yet, since the Civil War in the United States of America, the radical left has sought, in its opposition to freedom and liberty, a cultural approach to loosen completely the institutions embedded in the foundations of the Nation, even unto the borders itself.

What safeguard has repelled the world's infestation of tyranny and wealth redistribution from the shores of this great nation. America has shielded itself by means of Christianity, Conservatism, Constitutionalism or Rule of Law, Capitalism, and Individual Sovereignty. Even before we were a nation complete, foreigners recognized the insurmountable security of our ideals. Marquis de Lafayette wrote, "In America there are none poor, and none even that can be called peasants. Each citizen has some property, and all citizens have the same rights as the richest individual, or landed proprietor, in the country." No enemy can destroy her from without! You can challenge one of the frameworks and, while the blow absorbed, the whole would remain. You need a vassal state from within that can act as God, rule with iron fist, miseducate the populous, steal the future and its wealth, police with absolute fear, destroy the patriarchal origins of family, and replace the individual with the collective. In the Diehard Voice of Alan Rickman, "I give you the M-A-R-X."

Ken, you slander Marx by saying Marxism is Slavery. The legal definition of slave and slavery are: "A slave is a person owned by someone and slavery is the state of being under the control of someone where a person is forced to work for another. A slave is considered as a property of another as the one controlling them purchases them or owns them from their birth. In slavery the slave dos not have a right to leave the owner or not work for them. Slavery is a form of forced labor. They do not receive any remuneration for the work they do."

Greg Jackson, Certified Educator, writes, "Marxism acknowledges that "unfettered capitalism" creates a system in which the majority of labor is performed by a class of people who do not reap the most benefits from their labor. This labor is done to benefit an elite class instead of benefiting the needs of all. The elite use many tools, such as organized religion and the promotions of racial, ethnic, and gender prejudices to help maintain their power. It is the responsibility of the labor class itself to emancipate themselves from this exploitive system. Relying on the elite class to level the playing field means perpetual exploitation. An egalitarian society requires the elimination of private property. It is likely that a violent revolution is the only way for the working class to secure their rights and privileges. This is an international struggle that transcends political borders. In fact, a true Marxist revolution would lead to the end of nations themselves and result in a global community. Once this has occurred, resources and labor will be divided based upon needs and abilities without regard to previous social stations."

Let us compare. Slavery is created by force and violence. Marxism is implemented perfectly by force and violence. In Slavery, mankind is made the property of others, either a ruthless cartel or corrupt state. Marxism requires the elimination of all private property because an enlightened cartel or ruthless state will control all of the means of production, which includes the citizenry. In fact, no citizens, for rights are granted by the possessors to the possessed in both slavery and Marxism. Slavery, by means of the slaveholder, encompasses the entire life of his or its property: the person. Marxism, by means of the state, encompasses the entire life of its property: the person. In slavery, the individual or the state becomes "God". In Marxism, the direct opponent of God, the state takes authoritarian control. Hence, it matters not if you believe in God, the State has the final say on if and when you could worship your "puny god". Finally, slavery never works because it inhibits mankind from fully operating in his God-given natural rights. But what of Marxism? Maybe it has never been implemented correctly? Clay Jones, Why Marxism Always Fails and Will Always Fail, writes: "Marxism always fails and I do mean always. Marxism has been tried again and again, with much bloodshed, but Marxism always fails. In their Communist Manifesto, Karl Marx and Frederic Engels were clear, “the theory of the Communists may be summed up in the single sentence: Abolition of private property.” 1 You need to give up your stuff or the Marxists will take it from you and there’s the rub: most people don’t want to give up their stuff. 2 This is the reason Marxism always fails, and will always fail: Marxism promises utopia but starts off with a false anthropology–one that contradicts common sense and what the Bible teaches unambiguously". Marxism is Slavery. Slavery is Marxism. The same Democrat Party that perpetuated slavery in the US, instituted segregation and Jim Crow throughout the country, shut down Churches during a plandemic, are the same that fight daily to install Marxism throughout the land. The Party of Failure can only do what a party of failure can do.

If you beg thee, that Marx as an economist was opposed to slavery because of its devastation to the American economy and the indirect impact on the European labor force, then, ye may be wrong. “Without slavery, North America, the most progressive of countries, would be transformed into a patriarchal country. Wipe out North America from the map of the world and you will have anarchy— the complete decay of modern commerce and civilization. Abolish slavery and you will have wiped America off the map of nations.” Karl Marx, “The Poverty of Philosophy,” [1847]. Wow, his prophecy was amiss. Now, wasn't it, Thomas Smith? In fact, he sounds totally different in his expression of congratulations to President Abraham Lincoln at the close of the War. "The workingmen of Europe feel sure that, as the American War of Independence initiated a new era of ascendancy for the middle class, so the American Antislavery War will do for the working classes. They consider it an earnest of the epoch to come that it fell to the lot of Abraham Lincoln, the single-minded son of the working class, to lead his country through the matchless struggle for the rescue of an enchained race and the reconstruction of a social world", Karl Marx, "Address of the International Working Men's Association to Abraham Lincoln" [November 1864]. When availing my street vernacular, I would refer to your Dialectical Guru, a Punk Donkey, as referred to in the Urban Dictionary as "a person who is a general jerk, asshole, or doesn't have any common sense and pisses you off to your tipping point." By the way, dialectics is the method used by Marx to advance his arguments by which change in the society can be expected. Mr. Smith, I did not want this to sail over your head because by your attack of me with the term "fascists", I pretty much surmised that you get all of your irrelevant economic information from Don Lemon at CNN.

I digress.

If you plead that Marx was a moral man that bore in his soul the pain of every lash struck in wound of the slave, I beg thee to show me his expressed discontent. I fear the modern University educated activist and cultural change agent lacks the knowledge that Karl Marx was a Jew-hating, white supremacist. Prepare for the vulgarity that Dave Chappell would not offer. After the Mexican War, Marx sarcastically asked, “Is it a misfortune that magnificent California was seized from the lazy Mexicans who did not know what to do with it?” We've got more. In a letter to Friedrich Engels in reference to his socialist political competitor Ferdinand Lassalle, Marx wrote: "It is now completely clear to me that he, as is proved by his cranial formation and his hair, descends from the Negroes who had joined Moses’ exodus from Egypt, assuming that his mother or grandmother on the paternal side had not interbred with a nigger. Now this union of Judaism and Germanism with a basic Negro substance must produce a peculiar product". O, yeah, he would have been overjoyed to meet fellow Marxist W.E.B. Dubois. Howabout this little number. In his essay “On the Jewish Question” published in 1844. Marx asked: "What is the worldly religion of the Jew? Huckstering. What is his worldly God? Money. … Money is the jealous god of Israel, in face of which no other god may exist. Money degrades all the gods of man—and turns them into commodities. … The bill of exchange is the real god of the Jew. His god is only an illusory bill of exchange. … The chimerical nationality of the Jew is the nationality of the merchant, of the man of money in general." Nike took away his sneakers deal after that one, Kanye. Here's one I recommend at the next visit to the synagogue: “Thus we find every tyrant backed by a Jew, as is every Pope by a Jesuit. In truth, the cravings of oppressors would be hopeless, and the practicability of war out of the question, if there were not an army of Jesuits to smother thought and a handful of Jews to ransack pockets. … The fact that 1,855 years ago Christ drove the Jewish money-changers out of the temple, and that the money-changers of our age, enlisted on the side of tyranny, happen again to be Jews is perhaps no more than a historic coincidence.” Karl Marx, [“The Russian Loan,” 1856]. Yes, but, we are not through with the Negro references. Orientalist Pierre Trémaux, a photographer of Africans on his visits to Libya, Egypt, and Tunisia, and Darwinist, could not avoid the Jew-hating, white supremacist. Tremaux “proved that the common Negro type is the degenerate form of a much higher one … a very significant advance over Darwin.” Karl Marx, [Letter to Friedrich Engels, August 7, 1866]. Raise your hand, if you ae part of the LGBTQRSTUVWXYZ Add The P Crowd. Yeah, Marx and Engels weren't too fond of your crowd, either. Lloyd Schewe writes of Engel's 1884 essay The Origin Of The Family, Private Property And The State on the family and the state:

“Sexual life inhabits the margins of much of Marx’s and Engel’s work. “The origin of private property,” they write in the German Ideology, “lies in the family, where wife and children are the slaves of the husband.”

Maybe they were unaware of the 72 genders of the modern era. They do not appear gender confused. Seem ok with that slavery thang though.

Former politico Yvette Renshy asserts:

"One theory suggests that the work [The Origin Of The Family, Private Property And The State, 1884] was translated to mean homosexuality instead of pederasty (Sexual relations between a man and a boy) to fulfil political goals. However, I believe that Engels’ could have equally been equating homosexuality to pederasty given that Marx and Engels’ own private exchanges often featured language that would now be considered derogatory and malicious towards gays."

That's homosexuality is pedophilia talk for those following along. So much for that Double-Consciousness Gambit.

I dare say a Jew-hating, white supremacist homophobe is the anchor for such the socio-economic lusts of "progressive" organizations as BlackLivesMatter, Antifa, the NAACP, the Congressional Black Caucus, LGBT - International Marxist Tendency and many other Pro-Marx Groups.

Marx had nothing but contempt for those modern radicals that subscribe to his falsehoods and unscientific presumptions. He hated the Jews. For this, we know that it would be easy for him to endorse Adolf Hitler and then, deny the Holocaust. He hated the Blacks. For this, we know that he would have shook hands with Patrisse Cullors and Alicia Garza, trained Marxists, and later promoted slavery as an appropriate means of production. He hated the Mexicans. He would have spoken proudly before the Congress of the Socialist Left (the Mexican section of the The International Marxist Tendency (IMT) ) held in Mexico City in 2022. All the while, he would refer to them as "breakfast tacos", ridicule President Joe Biden for claiming the Puerto Ricans, and endorse the efforts of Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Secretary Alejandro Nicholas Mayorkas to eradicate America's borders as part of the overthrow of capitalism around the world. He hated the homosexuals. Engels and Marx would have enjoyed the Liberation School Award them for their work, "The Origin Of The Family, Private Property And The State, (1884) because it promotes the fact that "Children were not the sole responsibility of the biological mother and/or father". Engels and Marx would have later ridiculed the fools, affirmed the gays to be as Marx called writer Karl Boruttau a “faggotty prick”, and then, refused to personally associate with any work or author that was pro-gay rights and resorted to derogatory humor in private.

Why does the Press and Media fawn over these anti-American groups? The answer to the radical leftist media. Much of the support for communism and socialism, the branches of Marxism, is among intellectuals. Richard Pipes, was an American academic who specialized in Russian and Soviet history, explained:

"Intellectuals, by the very nature of their professions, grant enormous attention to words and ideas. And they are attracted by socialist ideas. They find that the ideas of communism are praiseworthy and attractive; that, to them, is more important than the practice of communism. Now, Nazi ideals, on the other hand, were pure barbarism; nothing could be said in favor of them."

That means radical leftists will always celebrate the ideas of Marxism, communism, socialism, Pan-Africanism, and slavery.

You say this is an answer to the radical leftists' media. But what of the conservative media?

The Miseducation of the Christian Conservative populous has misled many to believe that our greatest threats are AOC espousing the tenets of community organizing, Sam Brinkman-Fried giving President Joe Biden $5 Million, or the lying resume of Congressional Representative Elect George Santos. These are symptoms of the corrupt state seeking to further impale freedom and liberty. Indeed, worthy causes to challenge. However, in truth, many of our modern conservative commentators are embarrassed to pursue patriotic news. Centuries of yellow journalism have fashioned itinerant ministers of the Good News of Christianity, Conservatism, Constitutionalism or Rule of Law, Capitalism, or Individual Sovereignty to be no better than country hicks and no worse than ignorant, racist, anti-Semite, homophobic conspiracy nuts. They hate the image and wish to be respected amongst their peers as intellectuals. They will never be no matter how many Kennedy Center Champagne events they attend or how they attempt to segregate themselves from all of those aluminum wearing nut jobs on the Right. The Republican mainstream media, through its multiple beauty queens and body kings, have convinced the political populace that the threat of Karl Marx in the United States came by way of the Frankfurt School and the political pride of the Franklin Delano Roosevelt New Deal Agenda and is limited to radicals like former President Barack Obama, Senator Bernie Sanders and Representative AOC. Many do not speak of Marx's approach to the US after the Civil War. Many are not cognitive of the Marx's Philosophical School's outreach to Communist W.E.B. DuBois who taught Marx at Atlanta University in 1930. We must be willing to direct America to what is intended to destroy it, where it comes from, and how we must defeat it.

Marxism Is Slavery. Say It Loud! Say It Often.

TECN.TV / What Your Social Justice Warrior Friends Won’t Tell You: Marxism Is Slavery