TECS @ TECN.TV

Wednesday, January 13, 2021

Guyana, Your Marxist Eyes Deceive You Regarding Joe Biden's Thoughts Towards Your Borders and Your Oil

 


"The devil's finest trick is to persuade you that he does not exist."

― Charles Baudelaire, Paris Spleen


Let us begin with the truth in mind.  


The United States is an energy-independent nation.  The Institute for Energy Research says, "U.S. energy production in 2019 was higher than U.S. energy consumption for the first time in 62 years.  Thus, the U.S. attained the long-held goal of “energy independence”—which is not to say that we did not import or export energy, but that we produced more energy than we used."  Yes, Republican President Donald John Trump, America's 45th President, allowed his Nation to achieve something undone since 1957 when Dwight D. Eisenhower served as the 34th President of the United States.  The Investor's Business Daily (IBD) opined on what made Trump more different than any other President: "It just requires government to get out of the way so that oil companies can get at the vast supplies of good old oil and gas right under U.S. soil."  Simply put, he allowed private industry to explore without the burdens of excessive governmental regulations which created surpluses leading to higher waged jobs and lower prices overall.  IBD strengthens this assessment by saying, "Trump doesn't deserve the credit for this boom. Oil companies do. But unlike his predecessors, Trump understands that energy independence doesn't require yet another "energy plan" that tells people to wear more sweaters in the winter and wastes money on "new" energy sources."


In the Spirit of One of America's Best Made Films, Mel Brook's Blazing Saddles, America must say to Guyana, "Oil?  We Don't Need Your Stinkin' Oil!"


Many Guyanese people are so deceived by their Marxist conditionings and false propaganda media that they believe the United States is trying to steal their oil like Joseph Robinette Biden Jr. and the Democrat-Marxists stole the 2020 US Presidential Election.  Guyana is a cooperative republic as having the following attributes: political and economic independence, state ownership of the means of production, a citizenry organized into groups such as cooperatives and trade unions, and an economy run on the basis of national economic planning.  It has transitioned from capitalism to socialism.  Literally, taking profit and productivity out of the hands of the people as individual sovereigns and into the hands of a corrupt few.  The President has an unlimited rule, which is why many covet the control of elections through unscrupulous party political means. 



While in the US, the Democrat-Marxists want Americans to "reimagine" a country where Big Government, Big Tech, and Big Corporations form a fascist control block over the entire economy, we can see the result of state control over a people and an economy upon observing Guyana.  This transition from capitalism to socialism must have resulted in the wealth creation of many individuals.  Right?  In 2017, 41% of the population of Guyana lived below the poverty line.  In comparison, the official American poverty rate is 10.5 percent, based on the U.S. Census Bureau’s 2019 estimates.  With an estimated population of 786,391, the only English speaking Latin American nation is home to over 322,400 Guyanese below the poverty line.  Guyana is one of South America’s poorest countries, with an average per capita annual income of around US$4,000.  Guyana, a nation with the twelfth-largest oil reserves in the world, has a tremendous poverty problem brought on by Marxism and not capitalism.


According to The National Business, "Unlike the US’ mostly very light shale oil, Guyana’s is a medium-light crude closer to major Middle East grades. Likely to be rich in diesel when refined, it helps fill a hole in the world’s crude diet."  Unfortunately, the Marxist nation that owns the means of production for every one of its citizens lacks the ability to control every step of oil production.  It is dependent on its capitalist, free-trade partners to extract the oil, refine the oil, and sell the oil.  An oil refinery is an industrial plant that transforms or refines crude oil into various usable petroleum products such as diesel, gasoline, and heating oils.  Oil refineries essentially serve as the second stage in the crude oil production process.  Why not a refinery to control the production process?  Guyana believes that it is not in their best interest.  


“We have never said that there will never be a refinery. At this time a refinery is not feasible… I think what most people are conflating is not if a refinery should come to shore, it’s whether or not we should have cheap fuel. A refinery doesn’t mean cheap fuel or the absence of a refinery doesn’t mean that you will not have cheap fuel, cheap fuel is a policy decision and there are many ways by which you can ultimately have cheap fuel… I cannot advise my Minister to pursue an investment down a rabbit hole.  What the Department is concerned about is what we call ‘no-regrets investment’.  When you invest today, you must not regret tomorrow… it must be monies that are well spent,” Dr. Mark Bynoe, Director, Guyana's Department of Energy told a gathering in September 2019.


The possibility of Guyana having petroleum stemmed from observations of petroliferous occurrences recorded by Dutch explorers since the 1750s, but it was not until 1916 that the first significant effort to locate petroleum was undertaken.  Almost three hundred years of oil exploration and not one oil refinery.  The Marxist Guyanese believe that they can depend on the Chinese or Russians because they are comrades.  China has little oil but a refinery.  What do you think their Belt and Road Initiative is for Guyana?  Let's just say dependency is the only option.



Since ExxonMobil and partners, China National Offshore Oil Corporation (CNOOC) and Hess, began production offshore in December 2019, Guyana has received US$185,338,324.42 in revenue directly from its oil share sales, which is held in the Federal Reserve Bank of New York under Guyana's Sovereign Wealth Fund account.  The expectation is that soon they will extract 120,000 barrels of oil a day.  Reimagine that money invested in the individual sovereigns and small businesses of Guyana.  Reimagine that the Cooperative Republic had set aside its oil share sales to be posited into the hands of the poor directly.  I mean it's a socialist nation where the State owns all of the resources.  According to Congresswoman Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez and Senator Bernie Sanders, it should be as easy to redistribute wealth as getting foreign nations like Italy to interfere in the US Presidential Elections.  Let us consider a hypothetical.  One-third of the oil share sales would be US$61,779,441.47.  If we were to divide that sum by an impoverished population of 322,400 then, each of the Guyanese poor would receive $191.62.  If the whole amount of the oil share sales were redistributed to each of the Guyanese poor then, each would have received $574.87.  Remember, Americans were brutally angry that Speaker Nancy Pelosi delayed consideration of a $600 per person stimulus payment.  A sum that is merely enough to buy groceries for a month and pay a couple of utility bills during the COVID 19 pandemic.  Imagine, for a poor Guyanese, how an annual oil dividend of $191.62 or 4.79% of annual wages would aid in overcoming poverty?  Imagine how an annual windfall of $574.87 or 14.4% of annual wages may alleviate the spoils of poverty in a land beset by corruption and despotism so great that over a half of the Guyanese population live in the United States and Canada.  An industrious and brilliant people seeking homage in a capitalist nation like the US hoping to build wealth and secure comfort worthy of their desires while their brethren are spoiled with individual hardship and economic abuse by the good-intentions of Marxism.


President Trump put America First and watched over the Nation becoming energy independent.  He moved the bureaucrats of Washington, DC out of the way so that the American people would prosper.  He encouraged private ownership of every stage of oil production: extraction, refining, and distribution.  He encouraged private exploration on lands owned by the federal government.  By any means necessary, the world would see the power and innovation of America as it pursued freedom from the threats both foreign and domestic.  He so wanted people in more politically and economically to make their countries first.  For this, the world despised him.  The Marxist Guyanese vehemently criticized President Trump to be a divider, a racist, and a provoker of poor nations.  The Marxists proclaimed, "American needs an uniter like Joe Biden for President and someone that will look out for social and racial justice like formerly Indian, now Black, woman, Kamala Harris, as Vice-President". 


Well, the 2020 US Presidential Election was stolen just for you.  Soon, you may regret it.


You are depending on your oil fields to lift you out of poverty.  Biden and Harris are preparing to bind you in the chains of poverty.  You may look forward to three initiatives that the US Marxists will employ that will globally impact you and your pursuit of wealth and independence.  The three are economic catastrophes: COVID-19 Lockdowns; Raising taxes on the American people while increasing economic stimulus; and introducing the world to a Green New Deal.  



The Hill reported after the November Election that America is headed to more lockdowns, mandatory masks, and more infringements on liberties and freedoms.  Biden’s COVID-19 advisory board wrote in an opinion piece, “To be effective, the lockdown has to be as comprehensive and strict as possible.”  The Exceptional Conservative Show® Guest Michael Betrus, a coronavirus researcher author of COVID-19: Lockdowns on Trial; made it abundantly clear that "lockdowns" are dangerous prescriptions for cultural demise and economic hardships.  Betrus writes, "To justify lockdowns as an effective mitigation tactic, those states and countries locking down must well outperform those that did not.  See how that did not happen anywhere."  Guyana can admit that lockdowns prevented it from achieving the coveted goal of 120,000 barrels a day.  If the American economy slows then, the world economy screeches to a halt.  What happens?  Oil prices fall as there is no longer a need for major construction projects and employment falls around the world.  When the office is closed by the government then, there is no longer a need to drive to work.  It sucks to have oil when you can't sell it.  By the way, what is one of Guyana's major imports to the energy-independent US?  Petroleum.  Guyana loses twice over.


But, wait a minute Marxists, we are not done yet!  Let's look behind the Biden-Harris Box 2.


The Biden US Economy during the COVID-19 recession has one ingredient: Raising taxes on the American people while increasing economic stimulus.  According to Forbes, Biden-Harris not only plan to Repeal the Trump Tax Cuts of 2017, but they also plan to raise corporate taxes.  Milton Ezrati writes, "On corporate taxes, Biden would make three changes. First, he would raise the statutory rate from 21% at present to 28%. Second, he would add a 15 percent minimum tax for corporations that have over $100 million in profits, if, because of deductions, they would otherwise pay less. It would work much like the alternative minimum tax in the individual code. Third, he would double from 10.5% at present to 21% the tax charged on foreign income from licensing and fees on intellectual properties. He plans to write the law so that the government could impose the tax selectively on a country-by-country basis."  Do you raise taxes on peoples and small companies during a recession?  Former President Barack Obama once said, "You don't raise taxes in a recession. We haven't raised taxes in a recession... we have not proposed a tax hike for the wealthy that would take effect in the middle of a recession...The last thing you want to do is to raise taxes in the middle of a recession."  Yeah, that was Marxist Obama saying don't do it.  Raising taxes slows consumer spending, reduces corporate interest in hiring and innovating products, and reduces tax revenue for federal, state, and local governments.  It's a kill all of the economy technique but what's stop the Leninist from pursuing his attack on capitalism.  Let's put it this way, a slowed US economy means a reduction in private monies leaving the Nation for the shores of Guyana.  This leaves you with a greater dependence on the financial kindness of the European Union, Russia, China, and Iran.  Nothing says independence like a reliance on tyrannical nations with separate agendas for slicing up your country's resources.



The Tax and Spend Biden-Harris Plan is not just finished.  You must roundly destroy the Trump capitalist economy.  You must use the COVID-19 crisis as an excuse to spend more than you have.  Call it an essential stimulus.  J. T. Young writes, "Even a massive stimulus will buy Biden only a little time in which to achieve results.  America may have a unique fiscal reality, allowing it to assume more debt than most, but it does not have immunity. There will be public and political resistance to piling on more debt indefinitely — especially if it is viewed as compensating for private sector activity."  Simply, there is a tremendous thin line between debt and reality.  Forbes Jonathan Ponciano writes, "Unprecedented government spending has helped ward off a grave economic depression in nations around the world, but the debt load governments like the U.S. are taking on to fund such stimulus measures could stall economic growth for years to come, the World Bank warned Tuesday, echoing concerns among experts worried inflation could trigger another recession."  Yes, there is a terrible day of economic reckoning when Wall Street Keynesians marry the policies of destabilizing Marxists.  So Guyana, what does it mean when you reject the capitalist President Trump and favor the Marxist Joe Biden?  You crush your own economy.  


According to Forbes, "Developed countries like the United States have headed up stimulus spending this year, though emerging and developing markets like Chad, Zambia and Ecuador are among the hardest-hit and most in need of help, the World Bank adds.  Such nations are already on the verge of defaulting on their debt, World Bank President David Malpass says, which could in turn spur humanitarian crises like those facing Venezuela, where food and energy shortages have plagued the debt-burdened nation for years."  Yes, tiny Third World nations like Guyana will suffer as fewer crumbs are available from the First World Economic Table.  


By the way, Guyana, compare President Trump and Joe Biden on Venezuela, since the World Bank considers it more important.  The Trump administration indicted  Venezuela's President Nicolas Maduro on drug trafficking and money laundering charges.  The Trump administration government took a bold stance when it declared that it was no longer recognizing Nicolas Maduro as the legitimate president of Venezuela, giving recognition to Venezuelan opposition leader Juan Guaido.  On Venezuela, Biden called Trump's policy toward the South American country “an abject failure” and said, “Maduro has gotten stronger.”  NBC News' Carmen Sesin writes, "According Biden did not outline any specific policy towards Venezuela, but in response to questions on Latin America by Americas Quarterly in March, he said the U.S. “should not be in the business of regime change” and “the overriding goal in Venezuela must be to press for a democratic outcome through free and fair elections.”  Biden is concerned by free and fair elections when he and the Marxists have stolen the 2020 US Presidential Election.  What do Biden and Maduro have in common?  Dominion Voting!  Nothing says free and fair like the Biden-Maduro partnership.  



Under Trump, in September 2020, U.S. Secretary of State Mike Pompeo visited Guyana seeking support for efforts to oust Venezuelan President Nicolás Maduro and build ties with the booming oil producer.  Pompeo and President Irfaan Ali signed agreements to strengthen U.S. investment and cooperation on energy and infrastructure while vowing to deepen cooperation on maritime security and drug trafficking interdiction.  Wait a minute, Guyanese Marxist, what US President sent his Secretary of State to your nation before Trump?  None!  However, your response?  We want Biden.  Venezuela thanks you!  The Human Rights Association of Guyana expressed concern that the nation of 740,000 people could get caught in the middle of the dispute between Venezuela and the U.S.  Should have been a clue to you Marxists neophytes.  HRC President Alphonso David endorsed Joe Biden for the US Presidency.  Empowered by the Election and Certification of Joe Biden As US President, Venezuela President Nicolás Maduro Demands 2/3rd of Guyana's Land and Oil Fields.  Guyana's HRA had advised President Ali to blow off Trump's Secretary for fear that “aligning Guyana with those seeking regime change not only threatens Guyana’s legal negotiations over the border, but it would also be politically absurd.”  Here's what he meant.  We already have the election locked up before the first US Presidential vote and if Guyana sides with Trump then, Biden will allow Venezuela to punish you.  Biden will be hands-off and offer only immigration special allowances to the US for those that will be affected.  Think about it.  Can you imagine sending angry Guyanese Marxists to the United States because Marxist Biden allowed their land to be taken by Maduro?  What is 2/3rds of 740,000 people?  Yes, it may be time to get the boats ready to send 493,000 people to New York City.  No worries, you will be greeted by Communist Mayor Bill "Warren Wilhelm Jr." de Blasio will welcome you.  


But, wait a minute Marxists, we are not done yet!  Let's look behind the Biden-Harris Box 3.


The Biden-Harris Co-Presidency will spend their time rallying the rest of the world to meet the threat of climate change.  Yes, Mr. and Ms. Marxist Guyanese, the Co-Presidency doesn't give a damn that you are an impoverished nation and that you have oil.  To them, you are the enemy.  You are the reason that there is so much pollution in the air.  The Campaign proclaims, "He will fully integrate climate change into our foreign policy and national security strategies, as well as our approach to trade."  For Trump, Guyana was a national security threat because it had a tremendous reserve of oil, no military that will protect you, and villains at your border like Maduro and foreign actors that wish to take your Nation apart like warm Plait bread.  For Biden, you are a  national security threat because you could garner self-sufficiency rather than submit to China's dominance and that your fossil fuels are a threat to the Paris Agreement on Climate Change.  Trump called Guyana, our friend.  Biden calls Guyana, our enemy.  However, the Marxist Guyanese fill up the social media pages with criticisms of Trump, his family, his faith, and his political policies.  Cutting off your nose despite your face.  


How do we know that Biden is coming for your oil rigs?  CDP, a not-for-profit charity that runs the global disclosure system for investors, companies, cities, states, and regions to manage their environmental impacts, released a report that condemned ExxonMobil and partners, CNOOCand Hess, were the world's biggest pollution threats.  Taking into account its combined scope 1 and 3 greenhouse gas emissions, CNOOC has been one of the most climate-damaging public companies.  According to the ‘Carbon Majors’ research, it was found that "100 active fossil fuel producers including ExxonMobil, Shell, BHP Billiton, and Gazprom are linked to 71% of industrial greenhouse gas emissions since 1988".  Biden & Harris seek the end of fossil fuel extraction, refinement, and distribution.  Not just in Pennsylvania, Texas, and the United States but, around the world.  Biden-Harris care little about your impoverished background.  They soon may watch over 2/3rds of your land going to Maduro.  



In closing, Guyana, your love for "Granger", for "Jagan", for the "PNC", for the "PPP", and for all things Marxist have blinded you to the reality of life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.  You have been guaranteed work by your State and yet, 41% of your people are impoverished.  You have one of the largest oil reserves in the world and yet, President Ali can only imagine 50,000 jobs being created in five years.  You have the right to free education but, not the means to develop technologies to manage the great gift of Oil that God gave you to steward.  You have the right to free medical care but lack modern firehouses and fire engines after over 50 years of Marxism and government rule of your lives.  Now, when it counts most, you choose to support a US President that will work gloriously for your demise rather than the one that sought to protect you from the world.  Austrian economist Ludwig von Mises wrote, “The Marxians love of democratic institutions was a stratagem only, a pious fraud for the deception of the masses. Within a socialist community, there is no room left for freedom.”  Certainly absent is the freedom to see the eco-political world clearly.  Blindness is a virtue of Marxism. 



CORPORATE ADDRESS


Kenneth McClenton

Founder, Chairman, and President 

TECN® TV

1307 44th Place SE

Washington, DC 20019

Phone   202-660-1329 Ext 0


THE EXCEPTIONAL CONSERVATIVE NETWORK®

www.tecntv.com

www.theexceptionalconservativeshow.com 

ken@theexceptionalconservativeshow.com


Monday, January 4, 2021

Irony: So You Sore Losing Republicans and Conservatives Want to "Steal an Election" from Office of the President-Elect Joseph Robinette Biden Jr.?

 


"That we henceforth be no more children, wavering and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the deceit of men, and with craftiness, whereby they lay in wait to deceive."

Ephesians 4:14


Many a scholar and profound expert of trade and world peace conjecture that these times in which we live offer the most burdensome problem governance: a constitution so fragile that merely applying its tenets will destroy the very foundations upon which our Nation stands.  "How can you support President Trump when he tried to overturn electoral college votes? That’s illegal and tyrannical."  Amazing how the trumpeting of the false narrative rings so loudly in the air from cable news outlets, social media caverns, and The Communist Manifesto-thumping pseudo-intellectuals of our day.  How weak a document!  How weak an institution!  Should a politician stand as a statesman upon the floors of the US House and Senate today, in the most enormous hour of our Nation since the Rutherford B. Hayes vs Samuel J. Tilden presidential election of 1876, and dare question not merely the validity but the sanctity of the certification of the electoral college then, our Nation shall perish even as the words are spoken.


Indeed, nursery rhymes of our youth are far better references to the tragedy of constitutional reporting by armchair social media tyrants of this day than even the writings of Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton.  Threatened by the preponderance of evidence and statesmen charged with the responsibility of representing the over 74 Million American voters that elected President Donald Trump to a second term, what is the best defense of the Radical Left and its Mainstream Media minions?  The President did not have a "perfect" phone.  Not the Fake Russia, Russia, Russia Impeachment narrative!  No, this time it is the phone call between the President and the Georgia Secretary of State Brad Raffensperger.  The Lid's Jeff Dunetz writes, " 'The WAPO claimed that in his talk with Raffensperger, Trump “repeatedly urged him to alter the outcome of the presidential vote in the state.'  The WAPO lied. When you read the full transcript below what becomes obvious is that Trump was not asking Raffensberger to cheat or commit voter fraud. The President made his case that there was voter fraud in Georgia."  Nothing makes Lincoln Project patrons like Talitha McEachin jump on the Zuckerberg freeway and spread half-truths and full lies like the Jeff Bezos WAPO.  Maybe there is enough time for "Barely Voted In" House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and "Hoping the Dominion Machines are linked to the Internet" Senate Minority Leader Chuckie Schummer to impeach the President?  We will call it the "Georgia, Georgia, Georgia On Our Minds Project".  The folly of fools often delivers the day in times when men are weak and passive and seek the guidance of blind men to order their steps.  Yet, the men of this day are neither fooled by the fanciers of George Soros funded propaganda any longer for they know that such profound readers of news and information to the American public are following the pipings of manipulative flutists.  


To contest an election, it seems only the sport of Kings and Democrat-Marxists.  T'would a socialist or communist in Congress doubt the legitimacy of an election then, CNN and its Joseph Goebbels Award Winning public announcers would render cradle to grave coverage of the American heroes that are sacrificing everything to save Democracy.  U.S. Senator Josh Hawley (R-Mo.) collected a few testaments to such squalor: 


In 2005, Senator Barbara Boxer and Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones Objected to the Electoral College Votes from Ohio.


Stephanie Tubs-Jones Said, “I Raise This Objection Because I Am Convinced That We As A Body Must Conduct A Formal And Legitimate Debate About Election Irregularities." (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 3:10-3:20)


Boxer views her 2005 objection as “her proudest moment on the Senate floor,” according to CNN. (CNN, 12/27/2020)


In January 2005, 31 Congressional Democrats Voted To Reject Ohio’s Electoral Votes. (CNN, 1/6/05)


Nancy Pelosi Praised The 2005 Objections, Saying Democrats Were “Speaking Up For Their Aggrieved Constituents” During “Their Only Opportunity To Have This Debate While The Country Is Listening"



Nancy Pelosi Said “We Are Witnessing Democracy At Work” And “This Debate Is Fundamental To Our Democracy." "[T]oday we are witnessing democracy at work. This is not, as some of our Republican colleagues have referred to it, sadly, frivolous. This debate is fundamental to our democracy." (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 32:49-33:08)


Pelosi Said Democrats Were “Speaking Up For Their Aggrieved Constituents, Many Of Whom May Have Been Disenfranchised In This Process." "The Members of Congress who have brought this challenge are speaking up for their aggrieved constituents, many of whom may have been disenfranchised in this process. This is their only opportunity to have this debate while the country is listening, and it is appropriate to do so. If there were other venues of this caliber, we would have taken that opportunity. But this is the opportunity. We have a responsibility to take advantage of it." (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 34:14-34:45)


Pelosi Said “This Is Their Only Opportunity To Have This Debate While The Country Is Listening” And “We Have A Responsibility To Take Advantage Of It." (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 34:14-34:45) 

Pelosi Said “Do Not Talk About This As A ‘Conspiracy Theory.'" "[P]lease do not talk about this as a ‘conspiracy theory.’ It is not about that. It is not about conspiracy; it is about the Constitution of the United States." (C-SPAN, 1/6/05, 39:50-40:03)


In 2017, At Least Seven House Democrats Sought To Object To Electoral Votes In Favor Of President Trump: 

Jim McGovern Said “The Electors Were Not Lawfully Certified, Especially Given The Confirmed And Illegal Activities Engaged By The Government Of Russia." (CNN, 1/6/17)

Raul Grijalva Objected After North Carolina’s Tally. (CNN, 1/6/17)

Pramila Jayapal Objected To Georgia’s Vote Certificate. (CNN, 1/6/17)

Jamie Raskin Objected To 10 Of Florida’s 29 Electoral Votes, Saying “They Violated Florida’s Prohibition Against Dual Office Holders." (CNN, 1/6/17)

Maxine Waters Objected. (CNN, 1/6/17)



Lord, Congressman/Congresswoman Maxine Waters objected to the election and was revered as a Voting Rights Hero.  Senator Hawley will object and the entire US Constitution will fall to pieces.  Hey, Congressman/Congresswoman Jim McGovern, beam me up on that Russia, Russia, Russia starship!


You see, when it was just a few House guys and a single US Senator questioning America's first perfect presidential election then, the Left scoffed as if they were at a comedy club roast of Kathy Griffin by former Democratic New York Congressman, Anthony Weiner.  However, on Friday afternoon, foam began to seethe from their scowling mouths when the name Ted Cruz was uttered.  Man, o, woman, this was not about a Sen. Barbara Boxer moment on the screen originally built by Jane Fonda's ex-husband, Ted Turner.  In District of Columbia v. Heller, Cruz drafted the amicus brief signed by the attorneys general of 31 states arguing that the Washington, D.C. handgun ban should be struck down as infringing upon the Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms.  Winner, Winner, Chicken Dinner!  Score One for the Conservative against the Marxists. In 2010, Texas Lawyer named him one of the 25 Greatest Texas Lawyers of the Past Quarter Century.  Democrat-Marxist, former U.S. Representative Beto O'Rourke, lost his Texas US Senate bid to Cruz.  The lap puppy for Planned Parenthood and Gun Control had his cowgirl hat handed to him in his election loss.  Score another for the Conservatives against the Marxists.  Yeah, all of a sudden contesting the election just got real.


Against the staunch "Surrender Caucus" warnings of Majority Leader Senator Addison Mitchell McConnell Jr. and his wannabe conservative sidekick, John Randolph Thune, Hawley, Cruz, and ten other senators have told them to kiss their Governor Kristi Noem arses and dared the Speaker Pelosi-Minority Leader Chuckie Schumer GOP to veto them.  At last mention, Sens. Ron Johnson (R-WI), James Lankford (R-OK), Steve Daines (R-MT), John Kennedy (R-LA), Marsha Blackburn (R-TN), and Mike Braun (R-IN), and Sens.-Elect Cynthia Lummis (R-WY), Roger Marshall (R-KS), Bill Hagerty (R-TN), and Tommy Tuberville (R-AL).  At least 140 Republican House members reportedly plan to vote against certification of the Electoral College vote on January 6.  Rep. Mo Brooks (R-AL), who should be the next Speaker of the House in "Take Back America 2022", and several other conservative members of the House met with Trump and Vice President Mike Pence to discuss the claims of fraud and said they were confident members of both the House and Senate would vote to debate the legitimacy of the votes.




So you sore losing Republicans and conservatives want to "steal an election" from Office of the President-Elect Joseph Robinette Biden Jr.?


irony noun

iro·​ny | \ ˈī-rə-nē  also ˈī(-ə)r-nē  \

plural ironies

Definition of irony

1a: the use of words to express something other than and especially the opposite of the literal meaning

b: a usually humorous or sardonic literary style or form characterized by irony

c: an ironic expression or utterance

2a(1): incongruity between the actual result of a sequence of events and the normal or expected result

(2): an event or result marked by such incongruity

b: incongruity between a situation developed in a drama and the accompanying words or actions that is understood by the audience but not by the characters in the play

— called also dramatic irony

3: a pretense of ignorance and of willingness to learn from another assumed in order to make the other's false conceptions conspicuous by adroit questioning

— called also Socratic irony 


We seek not to overturn elections.  We seek the implementation of justice as afforded by the United States Constitution.  Senator Cruz says it best:


"Look, we got to vote on January 6th on certification and every member of Congress faces a dilemma. Frankly, two pretty lousy choices: one, we can vote to certify by not considering any objection. If we do that, that will be heard by a lot of Americans as saying, 'We don't think voter fraud is a real concern. We don't think these claims should be investigated thoroughly,'" Cruz explained. "I know that's not what most of us believe. And, secondly, almost all of us don't want to be in a position where we're suggesting setting aside the results of an election just because the candidate we supported didn't happen to prevail. That's not a principled constitutional position."



"I’m a conservative. I voted Republican, and we lost. The notion that if you lose it must be rigged is a position that should have been corrected on the playground years ago. I hope our children are not paying attention. This is really an embarrassment."

Craig Eichelman / Facebook / Missouri Conservative Forum


I suppose Craig and others like him never heard of the 1961 St Joseph's Hawks.  Head coach Jack Ramsey's team finished third place in the NCAA Tournament, but all four of their tournament games were wiped off the books after an NCAA investigation involving impermissible benefits from gambling.  Wait a minute, someone actually testified that an egregious error was made for the whole world to see.  That this act was done in secret in an attempt to keep the world from knowing.  As well, in finding out, the appropriate institutions were challenged to do something about it and they did.  The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) actually penalized the University.  Apparently, it was illegal to take bribes and fix games on the playground.  On the street, they call it "hustling".  I hope our children are not paying attention. This is really an embarrassment.


Since you believe that what is done is done no matter in what manner it is done then, let us send a special message to some people that can do something about it.


Senate Majority Leader McConnell, because President Donald Trump secured the First Perfect Presidential Election--one without either Voter Suppression (Greatest Concern of Democrat-Marxists) or Voter Fraud (Certainly Unproved in At Least 7 State Elections: Georgia, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Wisconsin, Nevada, Arizona, and New Mexico) then, we no longer need the following Federal Election laws passed over the years to help protect Americans’ right to vote and make it easier for citizens to exercise that right: 


The Civil Rights Acts created some of the earliest federal protections against discrimination in voting. These protections were first outlined by the Civil Rights Act of 1870 and were later amended by the Civil Rights Acts of 

1957 

1960 

1964 


The Voting Rights Act of 1965 prohibited voter discrimination based on race, color, or membership in a language minority group. It also required certain places to provide election materials in languages besides English. 


The Voting Accessibility for the Elderly and Handicapped Act of 1984 required polling places to be accessible to people with disabilities. 


The Uniformed and Overseas Citizens Absentee Voting Act (UOCAVA) of 1986 allowed members of the U.S. armed forces and overseas U.S. voters to register and vote by mail. 


The National Voter Registration Act (NVRA) of 1993 created new ways to register to vote. It also called for states to keep more accurate voter registration lists. 


The Help America Vote Act (HAVA) of 2002 authorized federal funds for elections. It also created the U.S. Election Assistance Commission (EAC). The EAC helps states comply with HAVA to adopt minimum standards on voter education, registration, and ballots. 


The Military and Overseas Voting Empowerment (MOVE) Act of 2009 improved access to voting by military and overseas voters.


We as a Nation have achieved perfection.  We no longer need to litigate for fraud, cheating, theft, and destruction in the course of an election.  Repeal America's Federal Election Laws!  Please Make This A Legislative Agenda for 2021.  Thanks!


Greatest of All-Time (GOAT): President Donald "Never Started A War" Trump.




CORPORATE ADDRESS


Kenneth McClenton

Founder, Chairman, and President 

TECN® TV

1307 44th Place SE

Washington, DC 20019

Phone   202-660-1329 Ext 0


THE EXCEPTIONAL CONSERVATIVE NETWORK®

www.tecntv.com

www.theexceptionalconservativeshow.com 

ken@theexceptionalconservativeshow.com